Among abstracts that were eventually published in NEJM or other top medical journals with the highest impact factors, 72.1% ...

Peer review and the editorial process yield frequent improvements in research abstracts of randomized clinical trial reports.

Study: Comparison of Clinical Study Results Reported in medRxiv Preprints vs Peer-reviewed Journal Articles. Image Credit: Jarretera/Shutterstock Background Preprints posted on servers such as ...

In clinical fields, peer review also has a protective role. Before a study about a new medication, procedure or care model gains traction, it is typically evaluated by others in the field.

New Horizons is a student-led, peer-reviewed journal that seeks to uplift the voices of emerging graduate scholars and writers of various disciplines within the field of theology. The Journal shares ...

Peer review and the editorial process yield frequent improvements in research abstracts of randomized clinical trial (RCT) ...

What’s Wrong With Peer Review? A series of high-profile retractions has raised questions about the process used by scientific and medical journals to decide which studies are worthy of publication.

Examining the methodology of 'peer review' and the need for courts to examine whether an expert's opinion is based upon vetted scientific research.

Scientists want pay for peer review, freedom to submit to multiple journals. Publishers say their practices have been common for decades ...